Legal Opinion
M. De Matteo Construction Co. v. Maine Turnpike Authority
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 29, 1960No. Civ. 5-46PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment in its favor upon the claim set forth in the original complaint and upon plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in its favor upon the additional claim set forth in an amendment to the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, 28 U.S.C.A.
The action involves Contract No. 210, by which plaintiff agreed to perform the grading and drainage construction along a ten-mile stretch of the Maine Turnpike from near Mile 87 in the Town of Webster to near Mile 96 in the Town of Litchfield. In its complaint, which was…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Peckham v. Ronrico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lathrop Co. v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Wilson Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Cities Service Co., Inc. v. Derby & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- HNV Central River Front Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Wilson Contracting Co. v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.