Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Schaefer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1949No. 11707PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
The several Macris, hereafter so called, contractors on a government contract under the Miller Act, 1 appeal from a judgment in favor of Schaefer, their subcontractor, for labor and materials furnished in the performance of a subcontract and modification thereof.
Continental Casualty Company, hereafter called Continental, appeals from a judgment against it as surety on the contract between the Macris and the United States, described infra, in favor of Schaefer for the amount of the judgment against the Macris.
The Macris do not contend that they are not liable for an unpaid…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Rigopoulos v. KervanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- United States v. Rogers & RogersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Sam MacRi & Sons, Inc., a Corporation, and Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. U. S. A. For the Use of Oaks Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Summit Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Fanderlik-Locke Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.