Lee C. Hess Co. v. City of Susanville
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the respondent in an action for breach of contract.
In 1953 the respondent city of Susanville adopted a resolution of intention to do certain public work within its boundary, proceeding under the Improvement Act of 1911, now contained in division 7, part 3, of the Streets and Highways Code. All prescribed action was duly taken, up to and including a call for bids, and Lee C. Hess Company, a corporation, submitted the lowest bid. The City Council of Susanville then passed a resolution declaring Hess Company to be the lowest…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- County of Santa Clara v. Hayes Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Susanville v. Lee C. Hess Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Myers v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Price, Administrator v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.