Legal Opinion

City National Bank of McAlester v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 14086PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error, the City National Bank of McAlester, as plaintiff against the defendant in error, Sarah J. Edwards, on a promissory note in the sum of $6,500, dated April 3, 1913, due 60 days after date, which note had been reduced to $3,087.33 at the time suit was commenced thereon on the 28th day of March, 1916.

The answer of defendant admits the execution of the note and then alleges in minute detail the facts and circumstances which induced the defendant to sign the note in question, and alleges that if proper credits are' made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Stuart v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Goldstein v. Union Nat. Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. RoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seal Oil Co. v. RobersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. American Perforating Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Spradlin v. American Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. HART INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API