Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Union Nat. Bank of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 15, 1919No. 6839PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
• TALBOT, J.
This suit was instituted by the Union National Bank of Dallas against appellant and I. B. Walker on-a promissory note for the sum of $5,000, dated August 30, 1009, payable to said bank or order on demand, and providing for interest from maturity at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum, and for 10 per cent, attorney’s fees. On May 20, 1911, the appellee Commonwealth National Bank of Dallas intervened in the suit, alleging that it had purchased the note sued on since the institution of the suit, and it was agreed by all parties in open court that these allegations were true, and that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldstein v. Union National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Morris v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Brobston v. PennimanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Kite v. EckleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. McCullough Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- City National Bank of McAlester v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.