Legal Opinion

Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Roe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 15, 1919No. 8966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Major County ; J. C. Robberts, Judge. Action by A. A. Roe, as administrator of C.W. Rue, deceased, against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Major county, Okla., by A. A. Roe, as administrator of the estate of C. W. Rue, deceased, against the defendant, Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, for damages for the death of O. W. Rue, which was caused by one of defendant company’s switch engines on which the deceased was riding, turning over and so severely scalding the said C. W. Rue that he died shortly thereafter.

The cause was tried to a jury resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff in the_sum of $15,300. (Necessary steps were taken by the defendant company to perfect the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. De AtleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Krogg v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Lusk v. BandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Earl v. Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. King Auto Service v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API