Legal Opinion
HART INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY v. Craig
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1965No. 40586PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, a domestic corporation, filed this action as plaintiff to recover delinquencies due upon an installment note executed by defendants, defendants in error in this Court. The following summation of essential facts sufficiently discloses the issues involved.
During 1959, defendants purchased certain machinery and executed an installment note ($37,474.82) due January 1, 1960, to plaintiff as payee, secured by a chattel mortgage upon the equipment. This note was discounted and assigned to an Oklahoma City bank. Defendants defaulted upon the first three monthly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Colbert v. First Nat. Bank of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Roberts v. BoydstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Strickland v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Whitten v. KroegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City National Bank of McAlester v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Corporation v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Bird v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Oklahoma National Bank v. Equitable Credit Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Dank v. BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.