Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pina

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1896No. S. F. No. 280PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. S. R. Dougherty, Judge. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

The deceased died testate in the county of Sonoma, leaving estate therein. His will was duly admitted to probate, and letters testamentary issued to the person named therein as executor. Subsequently the executor resigned his trust without having closed the administration of the estate, and thereafter, in 1891, *15an administrator with the will annexed was appointed and qualified.

In March, 1895, while the administration was still incomplete, the bondsmen of the administrator withdrew from his bond, and on the 26th of that month his letters were revoked for failure to file a new bond. Thereupon,…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fowler v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Frascona v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API