Legal Opinion

Sterling Varnish Company v. Louis Allis Company

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 19, 1957No. Civ. A. 5113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the motion of the plaintiff for an order modifying this court’s decision of November 7, 1956, reported in 145 F.Supp. 810. In the decision of November 7, 1956, this court held that claims 2 and 7 of plaintiff’s patent 2,417,538, hereinafter referred to as letters patent ’538, were void for double patenting. It was the opinion of the court that claims 2 and 7 of letters patent ’538 were for the same invention as that claimed in letters patent 2,411,180, hereinafter referred to as letters patent ’180.

Shortly after the court handed down its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Underwood v. GerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Deister Concentrator Co. v. Deister Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  5. Sterling Varnish Co. v. Louis Allis Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  3. C-Thru Products, Inc. v. Uniflex, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  4. Adidas Fabrique De Chaussures De Sport v. Andmore Sportswear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Application of Albert Bowers and James C. OrrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API