Legal Opinion

Adidas Fabrique De Chaussures De Sport v. Andmore Sportswear Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 11, 1984No. 82 Civ. 3325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

GAGLIARDI, District Judge.

Plaintiff Adidas Fabrique De Chaussures De Sport (“Adidas”) brought this action against defendants Andmore Sportswear Corp. (“Andmore”) and The Finals Racing Swimsuits, Ltd. (“Finals”), alleging that four of Adidas’ patents for women’s swimsuits have been infringed by the defendants. Defendants have moved for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., on the ground that two of plaintiff’s patents are invalid by virtue of “double patenting.”

Background

Plaintiff is the assignee of three design patents and one utility patent that are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw, Incorporated v. Rexnord, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Application of Luke Thorington, Gerald Schiazzano and Joel ShurganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. In Re HargravesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bayer AG v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API