Legal Opinion
In Re Copeman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 5, 1943No. Patent Appeal 4735PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
• BLAND, Associate Judge.
Lloyd G. Copeman has appealed here from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, which affirmed the decision of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 1 to 5 inclusive (all the claims) of his application for a patent relating to a “process of coating knit articles and product thereof.” The alleged invention has especially to do with a “novel process of coating or treating knit articles formed of thin fine threads which are easily subject to ‘laddering’ or ‘runs’ such, for instance, as sheer silk stockings.” It comprises the use of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In Re ByckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In Re BargeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- In Re LaughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- In Re SlepianCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- United States v. Harold Sapperstein and Anne SappersteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Application of ColemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Helen Russell Pierce, of the Last Will and Testament of George Washington Pierce, Deceased v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.