Legal Opinion
C-Thru Products, Inc. v. Uniflex, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1966No. 64-C-1120PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This action was instituted by plaintiff Leon Laguerre, the patentee of two Laguerre patents numbers 3,140,038 (the first Laguerre patent) and 3,227,358 (the second Laguerre patent), and plaintiff C-Thru Products, Inc., his exclusive United States licensee, for infringement of both patents. Defendant, denying the validity and infringement of both patents, brings three motions pursuant to Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for partial summary judgment holding (1) both patents invalid under 35 U.S.C.A. § 103, (2) non-infringement of the first…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reeves Brothers, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. U. S. Laminating Corp. And Travis Rauch, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Allen-Bradley Company v. Air Reduction CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Application of Arthur Philip JentoftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Trimble Products Inc. v. W. T. Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.