Legal Opinion

Application of Albert Bowers and James C. Orr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 12, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7584PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Syntex Corporation is the common assignee of the appealed application1 and the 2 patents2 relied upon for the rejection. Different joint inventors are *887named in the application and in the patents. Albert Bowers, one of the nominal appellants here, is one of the joint inventors in the appealed application and in the 2 above named patents. The appealed application is senior in filing date to the applications upon which the patents were issued.

The Board of Appeals in its decision of March 18, 1964 affirmed3 the rejection of appealed claims 1 to 12 of appellants’ application as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. BrennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  3. In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. In re SiuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District, and A.P.T., Inc., a California Corp. D/B/A Calvert Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Application of Oliver C. EckelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API