Legal Opinion

Corosa Realty v. Covenant Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 18, 1988No. 6146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The plaintiffs, Corosa Realty and Domenic Rosa, sought damages from the defendant, Covenant Insurance Company, claiming that the defendant wrongfully refused to pay the proceeds of a fire insurance policy on a residence owned by Corosa Realty and occupied by Domenic Rosa1 which was destroyed by fire. The plaintiffs’ ten count complaint essentially alleged that the defendant, by failing to pay the loss, breached its contract with the plaintiffs and also the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In its answer, the defendant denied the material allegations of the complaint and pleaded…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Verrastro v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Sturdivant v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Perez v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Sciola v. ShernowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pizza Connection, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Perry v. Hospital of St. RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API