Legal Opinion

Mendrochowicz v. Wolfe

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 17, 1953PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against three defendants, two of whom were Herman and Doris Wolfe, described in the writ as husband and *508wife and as residing in Northampton, Massachusetts. We shall treat the case as if they were the only defendants.

The complaint is in three counts. The first sets forth that through his fraudulent representations the defendant Herman Wolfe acquired title to a parcel of land in Milford owned by the plaintiff and known as 37-41 East Broadway; the second alleges that Herman fraudulently obtained a hardware business owned and conducted by the plaintiff on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Smith v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  4. Appeal From Probate of WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. O'Sullivan v. OvertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Charlton Press, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Mazzei v. CantalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API