Legal Opinion

Whitesell v. Houlton

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1981No. 6412; CIVIL NO. SCP 76-75PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, J.

In this case, the district court held an owner of a banyan 1 tree liable for damages it caused to a neighbor’s property and for the cost incurred by the neighbor in cutting it back. The primary issues are whether a tree owner has a duty to prevent his tree from damaging his neighbor’s property and whether he is liable for the damage caused. We answer yes to both questions and we affirm.

Plaintiffs-Appellees Whitesells and Defendant- Appellant Houlton own and occupy adjoining residential properties.

Houlton’s property contains a banyan tree 80 to 90 feet high with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Smith v. HoltSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  5. Shevlin v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Jones v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Abbinett v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Fancher v. FagellaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  5. Cannon v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API