Legal Opinion

Fancher v. Fagella

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 14, 2007No. Record 062339PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENIOR Justice CHARLES S. RUSSELL.

This is an interlocutory appeal taken pursuant to Code § 8.01-670(B)(1) from an order denying injunctive relief. The dispositive question is whether an injunction may issue to compel an adjoining landowner to remove a tree, the roots of which intrude into, and cause significant, continuous and increasing structural damage to the plaintiff's property. The appeal requires us to revisit our holding in Smith v. Holt, 174 Va. 213 , 5 S.E.2d 492 (1939).

Facts and Proceedings

The essential facts are not in dispute. Richard A. Fancher and Joseph B. Fagella are the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Whitesell v. HoultonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Akers v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  5. Smith v. HoltSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Levisa Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Forest Lakes Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. United Land Corp. of Am.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  4. Cline v. DUNLORA SOUTH, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
  5. Richard Herring of Herring Chiropractic Clinic v. Lisbon Partners Credit Fund, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API