Shevlin v. Johnston
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The defendant appeals on the judgment-roll from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
The complaint alleges and the court finds that the parties are adjoining land owners, their common boundary being 1,300 feet in length; that along said boundary line, from one to ten feet therefrom, there is growing a row of eucalyptus and cottonwood trees on defendant’s land, spaced from six to eight feet apart; that the roots of the eucalyptus trees extend laterally a distance of 62 feet and upward and those of the cottonwood trees 30 feet and upward into plaintiff’s land; that on plaintiff’s land, adjacent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Buckingham v. ElliottMississippi Supreme Court · 1884
- Ackerman v. EllisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Holmberg v. BerginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Whitesell v. HoultonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- Abbinett v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.