Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wagner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1993No. 02826PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order entered by the Honorable. Samuel Salus, granting defendants’/appellees’ demurrer to plaintiffs’/appellants’ amended complaint. Appellants’ trees were extending into appellees’ property. After appellees’ clipped the protruding branches, appellants initiated this action seeking monetary relief for the damage done to their trees. The trial judge held that no cause of action exists for the type of damages sought, and dismissed appellants’ complaint with prejudice. We affirm.

When considering a ruling on preliminary objections in the form of a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. BIG BASS LAKE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. WarrenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Koresko v. FarleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Diffenderfer v. StanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Dombrowski v. Gould Electronics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API