Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 28, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5240PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This case involves the liability of an adjoining landowner for roots from a eucalyptus tree which invaded the subsurface of his neighbor’s land. The trial court, sitting without a jury, and on the basis of conflicting evidence, found that the roots had caused no actual damage. It denied an award of any damages and refused to grant injunctive relief by ordering the appellee to remove the offending roots and tree. Appellant contends the trial court erred in not granting the injunctive relief. We do not agree and we affirm.

Appellant urges us to adopt the view found in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. McCrann v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barnes v. OutlawArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Jones v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Garcia v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API