Sterling v. Weinstein
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff — appellee—is the owner of a piece of land bordering on an unimproved public alley about ten feet wide. The building on his property extends to, -or very close to, the alley line. Defendant — appellant — owns land across the alley. On defendant’s land, very close to the alley line, are two rather large trees, the branches of which extend across the alley and overhang plaintiff’s property. Leaves and buds from these branches fall onto plaintiff’s building and on a number of occasions have stopped up the gutters and water from the gutters has overflowed the wall.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Michalson v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bailey v. ZlotnickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Granberry v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jones v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lane v. WJ. Curry & SonsTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Whitt v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Whitesell v. HoultonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- Abbinett v. FoxNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.