Legal Opinion
Randall Co. v. Briggs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 26, 1933No. 29,345PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORING, Justice.
In an action to recover on a printing bill, plaintiff had a verdict. The defendants Briggs and Binswanger have appealed from an order denying- their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Prior to December, 1930, the defendant Locheed, doing business under the name of the Minnesota Parent-Teacher Publishing Company with offices at the Louis F. Dow Company plant, had been publishing the Minnesota Parent-Teacher magazine. Briggs and Binswanger were engaged in publicity work and insurance, with offices in the Minnesota Building, St. Paul. December 9, 1930,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Griggs v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- McDonald v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Dybvig v. Minneapolis SanatoriumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Cyrus v. CyrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Blumberg v. PalmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Wormsbecker v. Donovan Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.