McDonald v. Campbell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover from defendants Emily P. Campbell and Henry Bergesen, partners as Campbell & Bergesen, $116.49 and interest for goods sold and delivered. Defendant Emily P. Campbell alone appeared and answered, interposing a general denial. The case was tried before Charles E. Smith, J., who found in favor of plaintiffs for the sum demanded. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant Campbell appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The action was brought against the defendants as partners to recover the unpaid' balance of an account for merchandise sold and delivered to the firm of Campbell & Bergesen. The only issue of fact at. the trial was whether the defendant Emily P. Campbell was a mem*88ber of the firm, and upon this issue the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. Prom an order denying a motion for a new trial, the defendant Emily P. Campbell appeals to this court.
1. The evidence tending to establish the existence of a partnership between Bergesen and Mrs. Campbell was not very satisfactory; but it was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- McDonald v. BayhaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Bestor v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- O'Riley v. ClampetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Pritchett v. Thomas Plater & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Cyrus v. CyrusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.