Legal Opinion
Blumberg v. Palm
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1953No. 35,871PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Justice.
This action was instituted in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover from defendants E. M. Palm and H. J. Card certain payments made under a contract entered into by plaintiff Frank B. Blumberg when he was a minor. Defendants contend that an actual or ostensible partnership existed between plaintiff and one Harold A. Soderstrom and that a minor who is a partner with an adult may not, upon rescission of a contract made by the partnership, recover back contributions he made to the partnership which were paid out under the contract.
The contract under which the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Wojtowicz v. BeldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Topinka v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Wick v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Zuber v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Shetka v. Kueppers, Kueppers, Von Feldt & SalmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- H. C. Nelson, Sidney A. Nelson, and H. C. Nelson Investment Company v. Seaboard Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.