Legal Opinion

State v. Arens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1998No. C2-97-2051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

Marc Joseph Arens appealed from a “cash only” pretrial bail condition for release and then pled guilty to the underlying offense. Arens contends that his conviction does not render this issue moot and that the cash only requirement is unconstitutional. The court of appeals declined to address the merits of the constitutional issue holding the issue was moot because the trial court amended its order before the court of appeals’ ruling. Because we conclude that Arens’ subsequent conviction renders this issue moot under these facts, we affirm the court of appeals…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Doe v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State v. CastleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schowalter v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Ethan Dean v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. LeDOUXSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Daddario v. ZIEM'S FLOOR COVERINGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API