Legal Opinion

Schowalter v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 31, 2012No. A12-0622PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On April 5, 2012, petitioner James D. Schowalter, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget (“Commissioner”), filed a Verified Complaint pursuant to the bond validation procedures in Minn.Stat. § 16A.99 (Supp.2011). In this original action, the Commissioner seeks validation of certain tobacco appropriation bonds to be issued to refund, in advance of maturity, outstanding tobacco securitization bonds issued in 2011. The only disputed issue in this proceeding is whether the proposed tobacco appropriation bonds are constitutional under Article…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. In re the Senate of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  4. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Bicking v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API