Legal Opinion
Ethan Dean v. City of Winona
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 2015No. A13-1028PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Justice.
Appellants Ethan Dean, Holly Richard, and Ted and Lauren Dzierzbieki brought this action, challenging a rental ordinance enacted by respondent City of Winona (the City). The ordinance, referred to as the “30-percent rule,” limits the number of lots on a block in certain areas of the City that are eligible for certification as rental properties. Appellants assert that the 30-percent rule is a zoning law that exceeds the City’s power authorized by Minn.Stat. § 462.357 (2014).
Appellants also contend that the 30-per-cent rule violates their rights to equal protection and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Brayton v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Gregory Baldwin v. City of Estherville, Iowa Matt Reineke, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police Department and Matt Hellickson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Forslund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.