Legal Opinion

Smart v. Bissonette

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Since the trial in the Superior Court the death of the plaintiff George W. Smart, administrator, and that of the defendant J. M. Bissonette have been suggested upon the record, and by order of that court the Hartford Aetna National Bank, administrator, has been substituted as plaintiff, and Joseph Israel Lord, administrator, has been substituted as a party defendant.

The complaint alleges that while the plaintiff’s intestate was standing upon the sidewalk on the west side of Main Street in the town of East Hartford, the motor vehicles owned by the respective defendants approached from opposite…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stickney v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Richard v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Wolf v. SulikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. O'Keefe v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Piccinim v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Rathbun v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Hall v. SeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. McDowell v. Federal Tea Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  5. Posey Ex Rel. Posey v. KroghNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API