Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Epstein

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 13, 1923PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The appeal in this action is based solely on the alleged errors in the charge of the court. The first claim is that the court erred in failing to adequately charge the jury in respect to contributory negligence. We have repeatedly held that an assignment of error in this form is not sufficient. The assignment should state in what respect the charge as to contributory negligence was inadequate.

The second assignment of error is that the court erred in failing to define contributory negligence. As the situation presented by the facts which the parties offered evidence to prove obviously involved…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Stowe v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. McNeal v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Foster v. FarraOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. O'Keefe v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API