Legal Opinion
Hall v. Sera
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 7, 1930PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The three plaintiffs were occupants of an automobile driven by Franklin E. Hall, and which was in collision with another car driven by the defendant Sera, about three miles south of Suffield on the public highway leading to Hartford on November 27th, 1929. The John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, the alleged employer of Sera, was made defendant with him and the cases were tried together resulting in verdicts for the plaintiffs in all the cases against both defendants. Sera made default of appearance and took no appeal, but the Insurance Company moved to set aside the verdicts rendered…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neff v. NeffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State v. PsarasWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Aisenberg v. Adams Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Barber's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Dillon v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Grandquest v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Evans Products Co. v. Clinton Building Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Hawthorne v. Eckerson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.