Posey Ex Rel. Posey v. Krogh
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, Ch. J.
These actions are an outgrowth of the same automobile accident, and by stipulation of the parties were tried together under an agreement to have separate verdicts and separate judgments entered.
Separate verdicts were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs and separate judgments entered. The defendant made a motion for a directed ver diet at the close of the plaintiffs’ case, renewed it at the close of the entire case and made a motion to dismiss — such motions being denied by the court and the defendant has appealed.
One issue is determinative of both cases. As respondent says:
“These…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Stowe v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Kayser v. Van NestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Willoughby v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Rau v. KirschenmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.