McDowell v. Federal Tea Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
These cases were tried together and resulted in plaintiffs’ verdicts. The named defendant appealed from the refusal of the trial court to set them aside and from the judgments, claiming error in the omission to charge as requested.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: Two cars were involved, a Dodge panel delivery truck owned by the Federal Tea Company and driven by Norman Whitney and a Chevrolet pleasure car owned by Anna T. O’Conneü and driven by Richard J. O’Connell. Agency was admitted. Both cars were proceeding south at about twenty-five miles per hour on Noble Avenue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Hassett v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Longstean v. Owen McCaffrey's SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Gross v. Boston, W. N.Y. St. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Frankovitch v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Merhi v. BeckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Neal v. Shiels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Mei v. Alterman Transport Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Collins v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.