Legal Opinion

State v. Pitt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 2010No. 011381; A137399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction of two counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411, and two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. He raises nine assignments of error. Eight involve challenges to nonunanimous jury verdicts, and we reject those challenges without further discussion. State v. Cobb, 224 Or App 594, 596-97, 198 P3d 978 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 364 (2009). The remaining assignment of error concerns the denial of defendant’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of uncharged misconduct. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. ZybachOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. SicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. LeistikoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. SillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API