Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 2007No. 031825BFE; A128590PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery and kidnapping after a jury found that, along with two or three others, he confined a man in a storage shed and then robbed him of weapons, ammunition, and other items. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the admission of evidence that he had participated in an earlier theft from the same victim. According to defendant, that evidence was inadmissible because it was not relevant to any fact in issue except defendant’s propensity to engage in criminal conduct. We conclude, however, that evidence of the earlier theft was relevant to prove the fact that,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BrumbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. WyantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API