Legal Opinion

State v. Leistiko

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 5, 2011No. C072939CR; A141169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, including, inter alia, convictions for first-degree rape, first-degree sexual abuse, and prostitution. We reject without discussion each of defendant’s assignments of error, except for his challenge to the trial court’s admission of uncharged misconduct evidence involving defendant’s sexual assault against a different victim. Because the challenged evidence was relevant to rebut defendant’s theory that the victims in this case consented to sexual activity with defendant, and the trial court was not required, in response to defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. Moore/CoenOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. WyantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LeistikoOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. KlontzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. KLONTZCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. Cruz-RojasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API