Legal Opinion

State v. Sills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2013No. 992639FE; A146207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant, who was sentenced 10 years after his trial, seeks outright dismissal or a reversal of his convictions for sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and public indecency, ORS 163.465, or else resentencing on the first-degree sexual abuse count. After his conviction in Oregon, defendant fled the jurisdiction. Years later, he was convicted and sentenced in California for other sex offenses and then extradited, sentenced in this case, and returned to continue serving his California sentence.

Defendant now contends that he is entitled to dismissal of his convictions in this case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. BarefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Sills v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. Lara-VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Sills v. KoehnDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API