State v. Hutton

In State v. Hutton, 250 Or App 105, 279 P3d 240 (2012), we rejected defendant’s challenge to the admission of evidence of his prior bad acts, holding that the evidence was relevant to prove intent, a nonpropensity purpose; we therefore affirmed his convictions for fourth-degree assault and harassment. The case is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of that court’s subsequent decision in State v. Pitt, 352 Or 566, 293 P3d 1002 (2012). State v. Hutton, 353 Or 533, 300 P3d 1222 (2013). On remand, we conclude that, in light of Pitt and other later-decided…