Legal Opinion

State v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2008No. 060130212; A133115PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWOLLEtEEM, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for two counts of robbery in the second degree, ORS 164.405(l)(a), on a theory of aiding and abetting. The jury’s verdict was not unanimous, with the jury voting 11-1 to convict defendant. Defendant raises several assignments of error, contending that the trial court erred in failing (1) to grant his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of evidence or (2) to give a unanimous verdict instruction. He also assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of 70-month concurrent sentences under ORS 137.700 (Measure 11),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. JayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API