State v. Cobb
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWOLLEtEEM, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for two counts of robbery in the second degree, ORS 164.405(l)(a), on a theory of aiding and abetting. The jury’s verdict was not unanimous, with the jury voting 11-1 to convict defendant. Defendant raises several assignments of error, contending that the trial court erred in failing (1) to grant his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of evidence or (2) to give a unanimous verdict instruction. He also assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of 70-month concurrent sentences under ORS 137.700 (Measure 11),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. JayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.