Reay v. Heazelton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
In its different branches and varying phases this litigation repeatedly has been before this court. Reference may be had to Reay v. Butler, 69 Cal. 572; 95 Cal. 206; 99 Cal. 478; 118 Cal. 113. The facts essential to this consideration are the following: In 1866 J. W. Reay, plaintiff’s assignor, commenced an -action in ejectment against Butler and Owens to recover possession of a tract of land. J. P. Treadwell filed an intervention alleging,his -ownership -of the land, and that the suit between Beay and Butler and Owens was collusive and fraudulent. He prayed for an injunction restraining…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Boyce v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of Lucas v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Pincus v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- County of Los Angeles v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.