Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Fisk

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1895No. 18443PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This action was brought to obtain a decree to the effect that Thomas Boyce was, at the time of his death, the owner in fee simple of an undivided half of section 15 in township 14 south, range 14 east, Mt. Diablo base and meridian, situate in the county of Fresno, state of California; that an accounting be had to determine the amount due to defendant upon a mortgage; and that defendant has no right, title, or interest in the land, except as a mortgagee thereof, and that upon the payment to defendant of such sum as may be found due him (if any) he be required to satisfy his mortgage.

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Cowing v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API