Reay v. Butler
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of tbe City and County of San Francisco. Walter H. Levy, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
In this action a former judgment in favor of one Treadwell, intervenor, and against tbe plaintiff, Reay, was reversed on appeal to tbis court witb costs to plaintiff. (Reay v. Butler, 69 Cal. 572.) In due time plaintiff filed his bill of costs with tbe clerk of tbe superior court, and tbe amount thereof was regularly entered in tbe docket. Tbe executrix of said intervenor moved tbe court to strike out plaintiff’s cost bill, and her motion was denied. Thereupon she appealed from the order denying her motion, and Quaekenbush and Ames executed on her behalf an undertaking on appeal,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Powers v. ChabotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Dooly v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Cent. Lumber & Mill Co. v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Reay v. HeazeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Estate of KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Weldon v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.