Legal Opinion
S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1947No. 4978PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANFORD, Chief Justice.
This matter comes to us on an application for a writ of prohibition sought by S. H. Kress and Company and Clarence L. Wise, who are represented by the regular attorneys for the Industrial Commission of Arizona.
On or about the 24th day of May, 1946, George M. Seivert, by his guardian Frank J. Seivert, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, against S. H. Kress and Company and Clarence L. Wise. The basis for the action was that plaintiff was a minor, age thirteen, and therefore was employed unlawfully by defendant Wise, assistant manager of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Fougnie v. Wilbert & Schreeb Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash LaundryUtah Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Esther Lee Begay, Etc. v. The Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.