Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash Laundry
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Chief Justice.
Is the Workmen’s Compensation Act the exclusive remedy for a minor illegally employed, who is injured in the course of employment? That is the only question presented by this appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Salt Lake County dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. Lupe Ortega a girl fourteen years of age, was employed by defendants, • from February 1943', to April 8, 1943. On the date last mentioned she was required and directed to work on and operate a power driven machine, to wit, an electrically driven mangle. On said date while so working her hand was…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Stetz v. F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hunsaker v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.