Legal Opinion

Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash Laundry

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1945No. 6686PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Justice.

Is the Workmen’s Compensation Act the exclusive remedy for a minor illegally employed, who is injured in the course of employment? That is the only question presented by this appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Salt Lake County dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. Lupe Ortega a girl fourteen years of age, was employed by defendants, • from February 1943', to April 8, 1943. On the date last mentioned she was required and directed to work on and operate a power driven machine, to wit, an electrically driven mangle. On said date while so working her hand was…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Stetz v. F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Chandler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1919

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hunsaker v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Cook v. Peter Kiewit Sons CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API