Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of Pima

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1966No. 8699-PRPublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice.

Pursuant to 17 A.R.S. Rule 47(b), Rules of the Supreme Court and A.R.S. § 12-120.24, we granted a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals reported in 2 Ariz.App. 134, 406 P.2d 852, which quashed an alternative writ and denied a permanent writ of prohibition.

Petitioner sought a writ of prohibition to restrain the Juvenile Court of Pima .County from taking any further action in a proceeding pending before it. The uncontested facts are as follows: An infant was born out of wedlock during May, 1965. The mother relinquished the child for adoption to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. BarlowArizona Supreme Court · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re AglerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Genda v. Superior Court, County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re Mark T.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. In re C.L.T.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API