Legal Opinion

Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 28, 1978No. 2408-3PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Robin Van Woerden appeals the trial court's summary dismissal of his claims for libel and malicious prosecution against Cudahy Corporation.

Two issues are presented: (1) Can it be said, as a matter of law, that certain statements made by Cudahy Corporation were qualifiedly privileged and that Cudahy had not abused that privilege? and (2) Must the plaintiff in a malicious prosecution action based upon a civil proceeding allege an arrest or seizure of his property and some special injury in order to maintain his action?

The pleadings and affidavits upon which the summary judgment was granted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Twelker v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ward v. Painters' Local Union No. 300Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ortblad v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Tyler's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McNeal v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Batten v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Keates v. City of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Brin v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API