Legal Opinion

Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1942No. 28495PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages from defendant for malicious prosecution. Trial before a jury resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor, but the court thereafter granted defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and dismissed the action. Plaintiff has appealed.

On March 17, 1939, James Cary, an employee of respondent Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co., subscribed and swore to a complaint before a justice of the peace, charging that on the preceding day appellant, Jess Peasley, had committed the crime of interfering with, preventing, or obstructing the search for, and the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Howell v. WintersWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Simmons v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Eberhart v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hightower v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ton v. StetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. AcostaWashington Supreme Court · 1984

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API