Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1980No. 46896-6PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosellini, J. —

The respondent brought this action for medical malpractice, seeking damages in the amount of $500,000. Responding to the complaint, the appellants asserted a counterclaim that this allegation violated RCW 4.28.360, and was injurious to the reputation and peace of mind of the appellant doctors. They also filed a third party complaint against the respondent attorneys based upon the same allegations. These pleadings were dismissed upon motion of the respondents. At the same time, the amount of the alleged damage was stricken from the complaint.1 RCW 4.28.360 provides:

In any civil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Twelker v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gold Seal Chinchillas, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re Tyler's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ware v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Tyner v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2000

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API