Legal Opinion

Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1979No. 46121PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

This appeal raises questions of abuse of a qualified or conditional privilege to a defamation claim and the elements of the tort of malicious prosecution.

Appellant Robin Van Woerden, a cattle feed lot manager, brought a civil action for defamation and malicious prosecution of a civil case against respondent Cudahy Corporation, his former employer. The Court of Appeals, Division Three, affirmed the dismissal of the claims on summary judgment by the Yakima County Superior Court because of Van Woerden's failure to show Cudahy's malice in making the conditionally privileged remarks and because of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Amburn v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Twelker v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Eastin v. Bank of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Ward v. Painters' Local Union No. 300Washington Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mark v. Seattle TimesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Dunlap v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1986

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API