Legal Opinion
Brin v. Stutzman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 2, 1998No. 39183-6-I, 39187-9-IPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Ellen Brin filed a replevin action against Roger Stutzman to recover several items of personal property. Stutzman asserted a malicious prosecution counterclaim based on Brin’s factual allegation that he “engaged in a course of conduct of preying upon women and obtaining from them items of personal [property] and monies under false pretenses.” Clerk’s Papers at 4. Brin then filed a separate securities action to recover financial losses associated with options trading recommended by Stutzman, seeking damages under RCW 21.20.430(1) for Stutzman’s alleged violation of RCW 21.20.010 and damages…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Norcon Builders, LLC v. GMP Homes VG, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Boeing Co. v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Standing Rock Homeowners Ass'n v. MisichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.