Legal Opinion

Ward v. Painters' Local Union No. 300

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1953No. 32122PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

This is an action for civil libel. Defendants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury and for a new trial were denied, and all except the Brotherhood have appealed from the judgment against them. The action against the Brotherhood was dismissed. We will refer to defendant local union as the union.

In view of the issues on this appeal and our disposition of them, we do not need to relate in detail either the pleadings or the evidence in this case. It is adequate to state the general nature of each of plaintiff’s three causes óf action. All of them arose out of allegedly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ecuyer v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State v. BrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ziebell v. Lumbermens Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Fahey v. ShaferWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Arnold v. National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gem Trading Co. v. Cudahy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Twelker v. Shannon & Wilson, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Janie McGhee v. Daniel D. Draper, Superintendent, Daniel D. Draper, Leroy Chamberlain, Dale Brown, Edward Billups, J. W. Puckett, and Floyd E. MottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  5. Demopolis v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API